Google Gemini had a difficult launch in early 2024 — the demo was misleading, the initial product underdelivered against expectations, and the general narrative hardened around “Google is losing the AI race.” That narrative is now outdated.
Gemini in 2026 is a genuinely capable AI assistant with real advantages over competitors in specific areas. Whether it’s better than ChatGPT or Claude depends entirely on what you’re using it for.
What Gemini Does Well
Google Workspace integration is Gemini’s clearest competitive advantage. If you live in Google Docs, Sheets, Gmail, and Meet, the Gemini integration is more seamless than anything competitors can offer. You can ask Gemini to summarise your email threads, draft replies in your voice, create pivot tables in Sheets from a natural language request, and generate meeting notes from Meet transcripts — all without leaving the app.
For Google Workspace users, this integration alone justifies the upgrade.
Multimodal capability — handling text, images, audio, and video input — is where Google has genuine technical depth. Gemini 1.5 Pro’s handling of long video inputs (up to 1 hour) is meaningfully ahead of competitors. For tasks involving visual content analysis, video summarisation, or image understanding, Gemini is the strongest option.
Search grounding (real-time web search integrated into responses) is natural and well-implemented. Unlike ChatGPT’s web browsing (which still feels like a tool being called), Gemini’s search integration feels more native.
Deep Research — available in Gemini Advanced — conducts multi-step web research and produces structured reports. For competitive analysis, market research, and background research tasks, it’s one of the most useful AI features currently available.
Where It Falls Short
Raw writing quality still trails Claude and GPT-4o for creative and long-form professional writing. Gemini’s prose tends to be functional rather than distinctive — it completes the task, but the output often needs more editing than competing models.
Coding is competitive but not leading. For Python and common web development tasks, Gemini is capable. For complex, multi-file codebases, it lags behind GPT-4o and Claude’s coding performance.
Context retention within long conversations is less consistent than Claude’s — Gemini can lose track of earlier context in extended sessions.
Availability in Australia — some Gemini features have been slower to roll out outside the US. Verify which features are available on your account before comparing.
Pricing (AUD, approximate)
| Plan | Monthly Cost | What’s Included |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Gemini 1.5 Flash, basic features |
| Google One AI Premium | ~$35/month | Gemini 1.5 Pro, Deep Research, Workspace AI features, 2TB storage |
The Google One AI Premium plan is the relevant comparison to ChatGPT Plus and Claude Pro. At ~$35/month, it’s slightly more expensive than both, but includes 2TB of Google One storage — which has separate value for existing Google users.
Who Should Use Gemini
Use Gemini if you:
- Are a Google Workspace user (Docs, Gmail, Sheets, Meet)
- Need video or audio analysis capability
- Want integrated real-time search
- Already pay for Google One and want to consolidate tools
Stick with ChatGPT or Claude if you:
- Prioritise writing quality over integration
- Do complex coding tasks
- Use Microsoft 365 (Copilot is the better fit)
- Want the most capable reasoning for complex analysis tasks
The Honest Verdict
Gemini is no longer an also-ran. For Google-native users and anyone needing strong multimodal capability, it’s genuinely the best choice. For writing-first tasks or pure reasoning, Claude remains ahead. For ecosystem and third-party integrations, ChatGPT still leads.
In 2026, the answer to “which AI is best” is legitimately “it depends” — and that’s a better answer than existed 18 months ago.
Try the leading AI tools yourself: Claude Pro and ChatGPT Plus both offer monthly subscriptions with no lock-in. The best AI is the one that fits how you actually work.
Try Claude Pro